Featured

Behind the Scenes: #16ToVote Advocacy Project and the Guy with a Plan!

A picture of me in Colorado being interviewed during my walk across the United States in 2015. I had just passed a little more than the halfway point in early August of that year.

New blog address, new effort to lower the voting age! But before I get into the details, I think an introduction would be proper.

My name is Jester Jersey and I was born, raised and live in California. For many years, I have been a supporter of lowering the voting age to 16. The story is long, so I’ll save it for another blog post. For now, I want to just introduce you to some basic stuff about me.

Although I’ve lived in California for many years, I had the opportunity to travel extensively in 2015, when I walked across the United States from New York City to San Francisco. At the time, I had just joined Kiwanis a few years back and wanted to help promote the Eliminate Project.

I was a little surprised at the media attention it got, as I was on several papers of cities I had traveled to and even on local television a few times, like with the pic above. I am hoping to have a more focused campaign that deals specifically with lowering the voting age, and I’ll be detailing what I can.

If you’re here, you’re probably interested in helping to lower the voting age to 16. You might have also stumbled onto my blog or was referred here to learn about the new movement. Either reason is fine. If you’re curious about wanting to help out and are convinced you want to help after reading my blog post in the next few weeks, then reach out to me. If you can’t help directly, there are other ways you can still help. Just leave a comment here or contact me through Twitter and I’ll fill you in on how you can help. Thanks!

Jester Jersey

Featured

#16ToVote Advocacy Project 2020

undefined

Hi everyone,

My name is Jester Jersey and I am behind the #16ToVote Advocacy Project. This project will be a movement to unite as many supporters of lowering the voting age to 16, raise awareness of the movement nationwide, provide support to current movements throughout the U.S., and a speaking tour in order to attract media attention to the cause.

This blog website will be my base of online operations. I have also linked my new Twitter account that I want to use for this special project, in addition to my other account, @DavisKiwanian, which I will use for support for my main one and act as a backup in case it is needed. Please keep this blog and my main Twitter account bookmarked so that you can get all the info you need during the campaign and speaking tour, as I will be updating both as frequently as possible.

Meanwhile, feel free to email at the email address I used to contact your organization with. I hope to try to update this blog weekly prior to the campaign so that I do not have to message each organization individually, but feel free to contact me at the method most appropriate for your inquiry.

Thank you for reading. I look forward to keeping everyone who is active in some form of the movement in the United States updated, regardless of where you are operating from or how long your movement has been active. I look forward to working with all the organizations I can, bring awareness to the movement in general to as broad an audience as possible, and perhaps, with your help, finally actually lower the voting age to 16 to more cities outside Maryland wherever possible.

With your help, we can make it happen together!

-Jеstеr Jеrsеy

Special Mid-Month Edition: Operation: Get Vote16 on the Ballot in L.A. – Part 2!!

A photo of the City Council chambers in downtown Los Angeles. The City Council members currently seated here when meetings are in session may decide starting within the next week by full Council vote if lowering the voting age will be on the ballot this November(Photo courtesy of Kaplan Chen Kaplan)

Welcome to a special mind-month edition of the Vote16 blog. As we start off the month of June & Pride Month, the Rules Committee arm of the City Council will be determining later this month which of the reforms suggested to them by the Charter Reform Commission that convened for nearly 9 months from last July to late March this year will be on this November’s ballot(Happy Pride Month to those observing & allies alike!).

This Thursday, June 4th, will be the Committee’s wrap-up meeting, so if you want to make the case for the issue you’re most passionate about or want to make any last minute appeals that can potentially reshape the advocacy field, sending in a public comment(written if you can’t comment in-person) before this Thursday is that final opportunity that you’ll have. I should also note that there will be a full council vote on June 9th, next Tuesday. While you can make the case on both days for lowering the voting age, advocating on the 4th will help the Rules Committee have additional information for consideration while next Tuesday will be the determining vote whether we see voting as a ballot initiative in November, so both days are important. The earlier you submit your comments, the more time it will have of being considered.

Unlike the meeting from May 21st, which focused specifically on election & voting topics, this June 4th wrap-up meeting will likely encompass all the reforms that the Committee has looked at since early May. From budget & city administration to police reforms & what future elections might look like, all these issues will likely be looked at at this closing meeting. After this, it will be all up to the hands of the Committee, and whatever they receive during these meetings & prior to Thursday’s last call, and maybe whatever they look at shortly after Thursday’s meeting. The key is to get your comments in as early as possible so that the Rules Committee & full City Council can get it. The later you submit something, the unlikeliest it will have any bearing on their deliberations. The council file is again 26-0489 & you can submit written comments through the public comment form online, at cityclerk.lacity.org/publiccomment/.

Essentially, this will be the last push for supporters of lowering the voting age to 16 to answer that call & make the case as to why the second largest city in the country could benefit from more youth participation in the democratic process. If this makes it onto the ballot like Culver City’s efforts recent efforts have reaped, then the case for its success will no longer lie with the Committee, or the City Council’s after Tuesday, but with the people of Los Angeles. We need that extra little push to get it over that hurdle, and this is where your voice, expertise and participation can come through.

One of the groups I’m working with closely on the Los Angeles efforts on Charter Reform, Fair Rep LA, recently did fantastic work around surveying many of the candidates running for office this November. You can read of their work on the candidate survey page that was released this weekend. These set of data points are important to the voting age efforts because not only do they provide a broad snapshot of the overall sentiment, or temperature check, of how candidates feel about lowering the voting age to 16, but they also provide useful information as to what concerns that you can address potentially address via public comment, instead of just sending a generic supporting letter.

For example, besides budgetary concerns around how lowering the voting age could affect the city financially, the implementation process itself is another concern being looked, whether voting machines could accommodate the change if approved by voters, or if the City Council thinks they can be implemented by the first election it would take effect by(in 2032). However, 15 cities have shown that implementation is not just possible but feasible, including the latest addition of Berwyn Heights, Maryland last summer. It is also important to consider that, out of all the cities with a lowered voting age, only three are for school board only: the majority are for both school board & municipal, citywide elections. Los Angeles could be the 16th city to be on that list that has lowered the voting age in some way, and there’s a strong case to have both school board & municipal voting rights on the ballot.

Below are some useful points to add to your written comment, which not only address the concerns above, but also align with the focus around the L.A. Charter Reform’s goals. At the outset of these recommendation-consideration meetings on April 30th, there were three focused & agreed upon expectations that reforms should seek to address. They are:

  • Improve trust in city government
  • Address efficiency & modernization
  • Increase participation & improve accountability

(1)Lowering the voting age builds trust in government because young people’s views are taken into account, and aren’t just a number in society whose only responsibility it to pay taxes. They make contributions to the function of the local government, spend a considerable amount of time in the school environment and are just as equally affected by local legislation that affects fellow residents who are no longer involved in educational settings. Quite a bit of trust has to exist for you to pay taxes on hard-earned income that you expect to have a say in on how it is spent. Therefore they deserve a vote.

(2) Implementing voting at 16 in Los Angeles for future elections addresses efficiency & modernization because rather than delegating a liaison to convey the wishes of young taxpayers between them & government, you can hear from them directly through the ballot box, so resources that would have been used for a liaison function or staffing can instead be used to address other issues in the city that maybe other reforms are tackling. This makes government more efficient & direct because there’s direct communication between constituent & government, rather than a middleperson.

Voting standards would also be modernized because other democratic systems in the modern world have either already made the move to lower the voting age in the last few years, or have made plans to do so in later elections, reflecting values of modernization that mirror standards that exist from other democratic societies.

(3) Lastly, lowering the voting age would increase civic participation because not only is the voting population expanded because a new bloc of voters can get involved, but increased participation could also influence participation from people who are already enfranchised but don’t regularly participate, and increase the likelihood of the newly enfranchised to participate in future elections. In the case of voting, it is not a case of “Too many cooks spoil the broth“, but “Many cooks can make the broth better” & “Many hands make light work“.

Also, when you have many who are voting on behalf of the interests of the youth, you also have more accountability. Governments are not made more accountable because of less voters, but more. Case in point is when democracy enfranchised women with the 19th amendment in 1920. It allowed more than 26 million women the right to direct participation & women were starting to be seen as no longer second-class citizens, but equals in democracy. This is possible with lowering the voting age, and Los Angeles could help bring that same sentiment of opportunity & accountability by lowering the voting age.

In addition to the email I’ve forwarded with additional resources to help make your case & support, I’ll be updating a Google Doc with a sample template like in my previous blog post from last month. As always, if you have any questions, thoughts, ideas or any interest in collaboration, feel free to reach out. Thank you in advance for your continued help on this important issue.

Jester Jersey

@Vote16Cal(California) Admin on Twitter

Operation: Get Vote16 on the Ballot in L.A.!!

A photo of the City Council chambers in downtown Los Angeles. The City Council members currently seated here when meetings are in session may decide starting this Thursday(May 21st) if lowering the voting age will be on the ballot for this November(Photo courtesy of Kaplan Chen Kaplan)

The process to decide whether lowering the voting age to 16 in Los Angeles makes it onto the ballot later this year is inching closer as the Rules Committee, the group of City Councilmembers tasked with determining which of the Charter Reform recommendations suggested by the Charter Reform Committee that began deliberating on the shape of the future Charter could start deliberating as early as next Thursday on their thoughts on 16 year-olds voting in Los Angeles.

Below is a list of suggested dates for the particular topics centered around the reforms, encompassing things like budgetary matters to the very local government structures of how the city is run. Next Thursday, the 21st, is the Elections & Ethics meeting, which will likely be looking at the topic of lowering the voting age. There’s also a similar schedule graphic posted by one of our local allies on Twitter.

While there is a wrap-up meeting schedule for June 4th that will look at all the reforms being considered, May 21st is the day supporters of election-related reforms are hoping to weigh in on lowering the voting age specifically. Although oral public comment will only be taken in-person, written public comment can be submitted in the days leading up to Thursday’s meeting, so if you’re a supporter of lowering the voting age & don’t plan to participate in person, you can still make vital contributions to this effort via written public comment, even if you’re not from Los Angeles. You can see an example of the instructions on where to send your public comments to here, using this website to access the public comment form. An agenda can be found on the L.A. City Council website for this week’s meeting shortly, but public comment is being accepted for it now. Detailed instructions for it are below, so be sure to follow them in order to make your public comment count.

All you need is your name, an email, the Council File Number (use 26-0489 only!) & your public comment itself in 5000 character or less. You can add attachments, but only one. Preferably, PDF files (up to 5MBs only, or a short .docx). If you want some ideas, check out this Google doc on ideas that you can use, which has the same suggestions on the email sample template I sent. Feel free to also send in your own version instead of copying the formatting of the sample document. Suggestion: you can either write a brief comment in the box & upload your written comment or type out your written comment in the form directly without needing to add an attachment. But if you’d prefer to send a graphic like an organization logo or photos, adding an attachment is the only way that would work. Either form of support helps, so choose what works for you.

Even if you can’t help directly, you may know someone who can, or are in touch with organizations interested in helping, so please feel free to pass the info along as well as my contact information for any questions related to this week’s advocacy efforts.

If you can send in any material, work, thoughts or even a few sentences of support, your voice can go a long way in supporting young people in the city of Los Angeles make a difference in their personal lives & their local community. Thank you very much in advance for any help you’re able to offer.

Sincerely,

Jester Jersey

@Vote16Cal Twitter Administrator

Coalition-building: Statewide & Nationally

A hand-drawn documentation of the “Women Fight for the Vote at Seneca Falls” convention in 1848. Although this saw the birth of the eventual movement to give women the right to vote, it was not until 1920, more than 70 years later, before all women in the country could vote. The vote 16 efforts could see national enfranchisement of 16 year-olds in a shorter period of time, depending on how supporters collaborate. (Source courtesy of the United States Library of Congress)

More movement on the west coast front:

Since earlier this year, I have been documenting mostly efforts going on on the American west coast, particularly in California, with references to other movements around the country. Obviously movements both locally & nationally are just as important too, given the importance of this particular movement. These are very interesting times, and connecting with partners locally, nationally & even internationally is important.

Last month, I meant to write a post that was more focused around Women’s History Month to highlight some of the efforts around the country that have been inspired by Women activists around lowering the voting age, but given the wonderful webinar yesterday evening hosted by the League of Women Voters of California, I think looking at the various efforts across the state in relation to the growing efforts around lowering the voting age to 16, this month’s post would continue the west coast focus.

At the webinar, we heard from the 5C(five colleges) League of Women Voters in the Claremont, CA region(near Los Angeles), The LWV Youth Council of San Francisco & the LWV California Youth Circle. Eventually, the slides will be up for most of the presentation, but these are just a general recap based on my notes. We’ll start with the 5C colleges.

Southern California has been really active in the advocacy efforts. Claremont High School had various representatives talk about voter registration drives, but also how their intersectional efforts with the Five Colleges in the Pomona region, has resulted in increased collaborative efforts to register new voters, particularly new college students who have to navigate the challenges of registering in near areas after leaving home to study. The groups in this area are also collaborating on efforts to connect with efforts in the Los Angeles area where Charter reform is currently occurring. In fact, some of those in attendance who’ve been actively involved in supporting the efforts in L.A. also spoke at the webinar, making that Vote16/League of Women Voters youth connection.

Next, the LWV Youth Council in San Francisco spoke out about how the rich history of the Bay Area continues to influence the work there. When you have a former Speaker of the House of the United States, a Vice-President who has repeatedly endorsed lowering the voting age to 16 in the last few years along with three nearby cities of Berkeley, Oakland & Albany that have lowered the voting age to 16 in the last decade(for school board in Berkeley & Oakland; citywide for Albany in 2024), it’s a tough act to follow. However the Youth Council was ready to rise to the occasion. They mirrored much of what was said by the 5C groups, and using the knowledge base generated by nearby cities that have already lowered the voting age to 16 in the last ten years, talked about strategies on how growing the movement using the tools, resources & skill sets that each of the youths possessed is helpful to empowering more young people at this time.

Finally, there was the more statewide Youth Circle coalition, who represented various parts of the state, not just one regional location. Some of the representatives from the earlier groups also had connections with the latter, encompassing group, so the statewide Youth Circle could echo much of what the second group mentioned about looking at cities where there has already been much success around lowering the voting age, but could also advise the different groups on questions they may have based on their vast geographic knowledge, which proved really useful for some members across various group because for some, this was only their first year as a LWV-affiliated group. If one group didn’t know an answer, one group either did or knew someone who would know.

The night concluded with additional connections among the different groups who were not already connected to each other, with interest in following up at a later time to do updates, continue supporting growing efforts as well as to look at places where newer efforts can spread. The webinar was helpful for all groups involved.

As the efforts continue to spread across the country, especially here in California, groups like the LWV, Vote16, PowerCA, and other regional, state, national and even international allies will be crucial to further propel democratic ideals in the 21st century. It is important now more than ever that young voices are heard, advocate and collaborate to empower not just young people, but also underrepresented communities and young women especially, as much as possible.

Jester Jersey

SoCal Efforts Heat Up on Lowering the Voting Age

Above is a towering photo of Los Angeles City Hall. It is the focal point for SoCal’s efforts to push for lowering the voting age. However, L.A. isn’t the only SoCal city to see some “lower-the-voting-age” action, as you’ll read shortly.

If you tuned in to last month’s post, you might have noticed that it was more focused on northern California, so this month, we’ll focus on more southern Golden State action.

If you’ve also been following the action around Los Angeles Charter reform, you might also be aware of the efforts to lower the voting age to 16. Last month, the Commission behind the reforms decided to do just that by voting to recommend adding it to the city charter for City Council to take up in the next few weeks, with the possibility of it becoming a ballot measure to be voted on by L.A.’s residents at this year’s November election.

Although L.A.’s progress at the time of this writing isn’t yet set in stone(there’s a meeting tomorrow on St. Patrick’s of all days to draft charter language), there’s a good chance that it will likely end up on the Los Angeles ballot later this year, alongside the mayoral race happening this year.

While there’s a quite a bit of action going on in Tinsletown, there’s actually more going on a bit to the west in Culver City.

Culver City has also pushed to get lowering the voting age on their local ballot after a previous attempt to get the motion passed in 2022. The irony of that was that not only was only a few votes short of passage, but it only failed by 16 votes. This time, the Culver City Vote16 group is ready for another try later this year.

Something worth noting is that at one of the City Council meetings a few weeks ago, one of the City Councilmembers alluded to the efforts going next door through L.A.’s charter reform by speaking about the importance of the work the local team is doing.

The work continues to spread around lowering the voting age to 16. More updates next month.

Jester Jersey

Admin of the 16ToVoteProject & Vote16CAL accounts

In The Heart of The Golden State

A Gold Rush stagecoach re-enactment going on in the Historic District of Sacramento detailing the events of nearly 180 years ago. Sacramento may be about to strike gold as its city Youth Commissioners, some residents & allies of the vote 16 movement are interested in starting an effort there.

With the efforts growing around Vote16CA the last few months, recent coverage of interest to lower the voting age has reached the heartland of the Golden State this heart & weekend month.

I won’t summarize the whole article, as you can read the entire story for yourself here, but the growing list of cities that have, are starting or have interest in lowering the voting age to 16 has now expanded to Sacramento, the very heart of Gold Country.

As movements throughout the state continue to expand, having a movement building in Sacramento is going to be really helpful because there has already been strong interest in SoCal cities like Los Angeles, Culver City & Claremont, as well as with recent victories like Berkeley, Oakland & Albany in the Bay Area. However, there hasn’t been much news in the Sacramento region, the capital area of the state. This demonstrates that there’s merit to our movement because not only do we have the main centers of the Bay Area & the southern California region in the conversation, but now also Sacramento, the state capital.

The move further expands the efforts to continue the momentum around lowering the voting age to 16 as other parts of the country are also expanding their efforts as well.

If a movement can be established in & around Sacramento, it will further add more credibility to the movement. The next step that would be needed would be to get additional news coverage outside of newspapers & online websites to spread further awareness of this important issue.

Jester Jersey

Admin of the 16ToVoteProject & 16ToVoteCAL accounts

Game Time

The Winter Olympics will be getting started in a few weeks in Italy, but the efforts to lower the voting age to 16 is just heating up.

This past week, I had the pleasure of delivering public comment’s to Los Angeles’ Charter Reform Commission, who is looking at rewriting the city’s charter laws, including whether to incorporate language into the city’s charter on lowering the voting age to 16. This is big news, as the charter hasn’t been officially revised since 1999.

While the Charter Reform Commission is dissolving, it is now being replaced by an ad hoc committee, which will continue the process. Fortunately, sentiments to retain language & dialog to lower the voting age to 16 have survived & continue to be in the conversation.

You can watch my & other supporters’ public comments on the video below, which are around the first half hour mark.

Because of lowering the voting age group’s strong showing, it is believed that this has helped continue the dialog as the talks continue & transition to the ad hoc committee. It is from there that the work continues.

Let’s keep up the pressure!

Gearing Up for Vote16 Efforts in 2026 for California

A group of people sporting an “I Voted” sticker. If we can get more cities in the Golden State to lower the voting age, we’re going to have a few more people being able to show of their sticker.

I just came off the last Vote16 virtual call of the year. Let’s just say me & the other attendees are energized heading into the new year with all the efforts we’re putting together in the Golden State. I can’t say much for now, but we’re gaining momentum.

This has already been a historic year, so I will let my posts speak for themselves- because even though I individually maintain this blog, it is the people I work with that have made this momentum possible.

We’re going into 2026 with new energy- & we want to make sure that more young people will be heard in future elections. We’ll work to make 2026 a more historic year than 2025 was for lowering the voting age!

The End of An Era; The Continuation of Another

A photo of Speaker Nancy Pelosi standing up to Donald Trump in 2019. We need more Nancy Pelosi to do this. Not just lowering the voting age to 16, but other things too. (Photo courtesy of the Guardian)

On January 6th, former Speaker of the House & congressional representative of District 11, Nancy Pelosi, announced her plans to retire from public service as a Congresswoman from the California’s Bay Area region.

The decision comes after nearly 40 years of public service, which saw her rise to the Speakership twice during her service in office in the early 2000s & more recently in 2019. This marks the end of a historic era by the former & first & only female Speaker of the House.

However, Pelosi’s legacy doesn’t have to end there. We of the national Vote16 movement, as well as the state & regional efforts like Vote16CA have the obligation to continue one of her strongest endorsements while in office- that of lowering the voting age to 16.

Although Pelosi may no longer be in office after the end of her term in January 2027, it is up to us to continue that endorsement of lowering the voting age to 16, which has slowly gained traction since her first endorsement of the concept in 2015.

When I set out do my nationwide walk in 2015, I wasn’t counting on getting an endorsement from Nancy Pelosi. I didn’t even know about the endorsement to lower the voting age to 16 until months after I had reached California, when I was

Ten Years In The Making: Vote16CA!

The photo above is from a news station interview I did in August, 2015 in Grand Junction, in western Colorado, where I was a little more than two-thirds of the way back home after starting my walk 2 1/2 months before that on a warm day in May in the heart of New York City. I was holding up a sign that I carried on my back(held with lightweight pvc piping on my backpack), but had rolled up due to rain for a few days.

It would not be until a little more than a month after before I reached my goal of San Francisco on September 5th, 2015. (Photo courtesy of KKCO NBC 11 News)

If someone told me shortly after completing my nationwide walk from New York City to San Francisco near noon of September 5th in 2015 that we would have a Vote16California(or henceforth Vote16CA) on the 10th anniversary of my completed walk, I would think they were the crazy one. If I did so, I would realize that this month, they wouldn’t be so crazy after all because after last month’s Vote16 Convening in L.A., and a meeting of a contingent of interested parties since then, they would be right. As of September 16th, 2025, we now have a coalition of advocates across the state in support of lowering the voting age to 16 working towards the formation of a Vote16CA.

Obviously, because of the novelty of our collaborative effort, I cannot say much yet, other than that we’re on the way to empowering more young people, continuing the vision around the L.A. Convening’s dialogue, and possibly, another Convening later this year.

What I can share as we continue to refine our group is that, unlike previous efforts, we are planning more, researching more & coordinating more, more so than previous efforts. Also, unlike previous, localized efforts, we’re more connected. Don’t get the wording wrong- we’re still working to lower the voting age to 16 in individual cities, but at the same time, there’s a larger consciousness of collaborative will, knowing that each separate city is connecting with a large framework of the movement, by state & nationallly, but also, in some cases, regionally. I am excited to be a part of this growing effort.

Ten years ago(or rather, more than that since I started my walk in May of 2015, 10 years& four months), I set out with several goals in mind, some of which I’ll list here. One of the main ones for lowering the voting age specifically was to bring attention to lowering the voting age to 16, after the success of Takoma Park & Hyattsville, Maryland, then overseas in Scotland, one year prior, in 2014, to a more national level. The second one was to make it back so that I could continue that work after my walk to promote the idea. That was difficult to do because while there were occasionally individuals who supported the idea, they were often few & far between. A Vote16CA helps fulfill that role now because I’m not the only one saying it- there’s half a dozen efforts within the Golden State collaborating together.

For years, I have tried to get national groups to concentrate on working in California, while also supporting efforts outside the state. Organizations have changed leaders. People have lost interest or given up. The political environment changes. Not me. Not after walking from the east coast to the west coast after braving almost every imaginable unfavorable inclement of weather. Also not after getting recognized by politicians for my work, both back then & even within the last year. Now, we have a state effort after three other states before it have succeeded in getting a form of a lowered voting age, either for school board elections or general elections.

Perhaps ten years is a long time to see such change, given that other countries around the world already had this for years before we even had it with Takoma Park. Then again, not too long after that, Berkeley gained the right for school board elections, only to wait nearly a decade to actually put it into practice. Oakland had a far long less wait than Berkeley. Hopefully this time around, now that we’re slowly overcoming obstacles that had mired collaboration around youth enfranchisement, we can make serious headway around lowering the voting age to 16. Obstacles in the way to actually implementing these are being addressed, with most either close to resolution or resolved already.

On a more national front, after Albany becoming the 13th city to lower the voting age in 2024, we’ve already had two other American cities that have done the same thing this year- College Park & Berwyn Heights, both in Maryland. This means we have momentum going for us as cities continue to get added. With more cities declaring success in this endeavor, this will make it harder for cities without “vote 16” policies to remain so. Sooner or later, movements within those cities will spring up as well, much like the cities that have already succeeded at lowering the voting age being influenced by other efforts before them.

Adding new cities is great, but surely other cities outside of Maryland would be great too. I don’t say this as a negative, but rather a way to move towards the next goal post, much like I did trying to get from one city to the next when I walked from coast to coast. The goal to enfranchise shouldn’t stop when one has achieved success in their locality- it should continue when those who’ve succeeded continue the work by helping those who have yet to succeed, much like in the last decade since my walk, I’ve emailed as many supporters of the efforts, connected with several organizations, gone to as many meetings on Zoom, spoken at several conferences & continue the work long after the last mile of my cross-country trek.

Vote16CA is like this- connecting the efforts that have succeeded, to those that have yet to succeed, to also those who have yet to start. It’s not just a sprint- it’s not just a marathon as some have told me- it’s not even just a relay where we pass the baton amongst the team- it’s a combination of all of the above. We really have momentum for us going at this time. We need to take advantage of it.

Here’s to hoping that we don’t have to wait another 10 years to enfranchise the next city- the 16th city to lower the voting age to 16, or the next 14 cities after that, to reach the same level we’re at today.

-Jester Jersey

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started